Oleh Duroyan Fertl
5 Juli 2010 -- Berdikari -- Piala Dunia FIFA 2010 di Afrika Selatan telah memulai putaran final
16 besarnya pada 26 Juni. Ia hadir di tengah dengungan terompet vuvuzela
yang tak pernah surut, kekalahan tim-tim besar seperti Italia dan
Perancis, dan aksi-aksi protes di jalanan oleh warga setempat yang marah
atas dana 40 miliar rand yang dibelanjakan pemerintah untuk membiayai
acara yang dikelola swasta ini. Sementara itu, kaum miskin Afrika
Selatan menderita karena perumahan dan akses layanan mendasar yang di
bawah standar.
Sepakbola adalah “permainan dunia” yang dimainkan oleh jutaan orang
di seluruh dunia dan ditonton oleh ratusan juta lainnya. Tapi benarkah
itu “permainan rakyat”?
Sepakbola itu sendiri seringkali merupakan suatu pertunjukan
menegangkan yang menampilkan kepiawaian manusia. Suatu pertandingan
sepakbola yang bermutu tinggi dapat dibandingkan dengan seni. Maka tak
heran ia begitu populer di seluruh dunia.
Namun permainan itu, tak dapat dipungkiri, disertai serangkaian aspek
buruk. Persoalan hooliganisme sepakbola, terutama di Eropa, sudah
dikenal baik. Banyak kelab-kelab dan kelompok penggemarnya menjadi lahan
subur bagi perkembangan kelompok neo-Nazi dan ekstrim sayap-kanan,
seperti English Defence League.
Di tingkat interasional, dukungan terhadap tim nasional mudah sekali
diekspresikan menjadi rasisme terang-terangan.
Sebuah “kostum pendukung” Belanda yang dirancang untuk Piala Dunia di
Afrika Selatan menggambarkan seorang pendukung Belanda menduduki pundak
seorang warga Afrika Selatan berkulit hitam. Iklan yang menyertainya
memberikan instruksi untuk “menyetir” kaum “Afrika” dengan menarik-narik
kupingnya.
Showing posts with label South Africa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Africa. Show all posts
Monday, July 5, 2010
Sunday, June 27, 2010
The fight for football: Is the ’world game’ the people’s game?

The 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa began its final round of 16 on June 26. it came amid the unrelenting drone of vuvuzela horns, the knockout of big teams such as Italy and France, and street protests by local residents angry at the 40 billion rand the government has spent on the corporatised event.
Football, or “soccer” in Australia, is the “world game”, played by millions of people around the world and watched by hundreds of millions more. But is it truly the “people’s game”?
On its own terms, football is an often thrilling exhibition of human skill. A high quality football match commands comparisons with theatre, poetry, and - all too often - opera.
It's also excitingly unpredictable - more so than other art forms. Where else could you see Macbeth get away with fouling Duncan, eke out a nil-all draw with Malcolm, and cheat Banquo of his dreams of the crown on goal differences?
Little wonder, then, that it is so popular worldwide.
However, the game is accompanied by a series of undeniably ugly aspects. The issue of football hooliganism, especially in Europe, is well-known. Many clubs, with their tight-knit fan groups, provide a fertile breeding ground for neo-Nazi and extreme right-wing groups, such as the English Defence League.
On an international level, support for national teams all too easily finds expression in crude racism.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
The Hidden Stories of Football in Africa
![]() |
| Former prisoner, Thulani Mabaso, on Robben Island football field |
Ian Hawkey, Anova Books, 2009.
More Than Just A Game: Football v Apartheid, The most important football story ever told
The world is in the final stages of counting down to the biggest show on earth – the football world cup in South Africa – the first time it has ever been held on the African continent.
While billions of people prepare for the spectacle, it seems time to review a couple of recent publications that put the role of the “world game” in Africa into perspective.
The first and most recent of these is Ian Hawkey’s Feet of the Chameleon, which tracks the emergence of the game in Africa, its ongoing exploitation by the old colonial European powers hungry for talent to improve their leagues, and the role football has played in African nations winning their independence and democracy.
Through thirteen themed essays, Hawkey tracks the history of such football greats as Larbi Ben Barek – Africa’s first football superstar – and of Eusébio da Silva Ferreira, who moved from Mozambique to Portugal to become the greatest – and most fought-over – football player of his time, on a par with the Brazilian legend Pelé.
Hawkey also uncovers the role of football in African politics (and vice versa), and exposes the process of economic migration that has seen such modern greats as Emmanuel Adebayor, Didier Drogba, Michael Essien and Samuel Eto-o playing in Europe, and has seen thousands more forsake friends, family and home, dreaming of emulating them.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Cuba's revolution continues
Following the announcement by Fidel Castro on February 19 that he
would not stand in the election by Cuba's National Assembly (AN) for the
position of president, the Western media coverage has ranged from
grudging acknowledgement of Cuba's social gains in the face of 50 years
of US aggression, to outrageous claims of "dictatorship" and US
government plans for a "transition" in Cuba.
The coverage has also been full of speculation that a new president could open the path to restoration of capitalism in Cuba, usually presented as "bringing democracy", via a series of "reforms".
On February 24, the newly elected 614-member AN voted to promote Raul Castro to the position of Cuban president. Fidel, whose image as the quintessential bearded guerrilla came to symbolise Cuba's revolution, led the revolution since the overthrow of the brutal US-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista in 1959.
Fidel had been president of the Caribbean island since 1976. He remains an elected member of the AN, and first secretary of the Cuban Communist Party (CCP). Despite Cuba's long-standing policy of promoting youthful leadership at different level of government, the Western media have responded to the transition from Fidel as president, begun in 2006, like vultures circling.
The coverage has also been full of speculation that a new president could open the path to restoration of capitalism in Cuba, usually presented as "bringing democracy", via a series of "reforms".
On February 24, the newly elected 614-member AN voted to promote Raul Castro to the position of Cuban president. Fidel, whose image as the quintessential bearded guerrilla came to symbolise Cuba's revolution, led the revolution since the overthrow of the brutal US-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista in 1959.
Fidel had been president of the Caribbean island since 1976. He remains an elected member of the AN, and first secretary of the Cuban Communist Party (CCP). Despite Cuba's long-standing policy of promoting youthful leadership at different level of government, the Western media have responded to the transition from Fidel as president, begun in 2006, like vultures circling.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

